Follow Us
-
Popular Articles
- Staff Editorial: Rabbi Dr. Meir Soloveichik, Yeshiva University, and the Jews
- The Orthodox Forum: What and Why
- Our Side of the Mehitsah: An Open Letter
- Rethinking Reason and Revelation
- A Burning Fire and a River of Tears
- Postmodern Orthodox: Orthodoxy’s Encounter with Postmodern Thought
- Agnon’s “Whirlwind of Voices”: Secular Zionism, Hanukkah, and Contemporary Jewish Identity
- Miracles in the Life and Thought of Rabbi Barukh Rabinowicz
- Why I Could Not Live Anywhere Else
- An Interview with Rabbi Robert Hirt
Twitter Feed
Past Issues (PDF)
27. Politics and Activism
26. Miracles and Divine Intervention
25. The Other in Judaism
24. War and Peace
23. Jewish Education
22. Jewish Leadership
21. The Year in Israel
20. Halakhah and Minhag
19. Torah, Literature, and the Arts
18. Kol Hamishtakker (Part I, Part II)
17. Jewish Denominations and Sects
16. Academic Jewish Studies
15. Family and Community
14. Musar and Jewish Ethics
13. Orthodoxy in the 21st Century
12. Jewish Philosophy
11. Qol Hamevaser
10. Jewish Education
9. Politics and Leadership
8. Spirituality: Teshuva and Tefillah
7. Israel at 60
6. Emunah
5. Torah U’Madda
4. A Nation Unto Itself?
3. Derekh Ha-Limmud
2. Judaism and Pop Culture
1. Religious Growth & Change
Editors’ Thoughts: The Riddle of Worship
I must confess; when I sat down to write this introduction, I found myself overwhelmed by a sense of chasing phantoms through a foggy maze. Upon my capture of a thought, it either evaporated before I could grasp hold, or else fractured into a thousand other thoughts. There appeared to be so many concepts compressed into the topic of worship, and, to complicate the matter, so many manifestations of each concept with rapidly multiplying interconnections throughout; how was I to isolate any one strand? And yet, one aspect did assert itself most insistently through themorass: Man’s attempt to communicate with Godthrough various media.
Oddly, what seemed so compelling to me about the communication aspect of worship was its very elusiveness. The idea of establishing a relationship with God is a bold, almost brazen one; what can we, limited beings, offer God, the One Who created us? From another angle, it seems an almost absurd proposition in its essence: How can a physical being communicate with the Divine? The vast chasm between Man and God ought to doom any attempt to bridge that gap to tragic failure.
And yet, Man has reached out to God since the beginning of history.[i] How are we to understand such a phenomenon? I am not interested in presenting a complicated metaphysical calculus as to how exactly the human and the Divine can meet. To my mind, the existence of such calculations highlights a far more important point: Worship is a philosophical riddle. As a way of beginning to grasp hold of this riddle, permit me to make an observation: The urge to communicate is a fundamentally human endeavor. We as people relate to others – including the Ultimate Other – instinctively. Just as an exposition on philosophy of language and epistemology is unnecessary to learn before one begins to talk, so too is an exposition of the philosophical machinery of worship unnecessary before one begins the endeavor.
This human instinct may be the most certain thing we can say about worship, relegating all other statements to the realm of the speculative. Does that doom our attempts at solving the riddle to the realms of either futility or irrelevance? I think not. If we take a moment to consider the broader picture, perhaps the mere process of reflection carries meaning. Even if one never arrives at an answer, maybe the act of contemplation alone can add depth and significance to the worship experience. In this issue of Kol Hamevaser, we explore the theme of worship – how it is done, where it is done, and why it is done. Think, read, and, most importantly, continue the conversation!
[i] See the story of Kayin and Hevel, Bereshit 4:3-5.This story presents the first instance of Man reaching out to God proactively, and not merely communicating with Him reactively.